The new king of $250 GPUs (for now)

When Intel debuted its first Arc video playing cards two years in the past, I used to be greater than a bit of skeptical. Could an organization that famously gave up on its final main desktop GPU venture in 2009 truly make a dent in a market dominated by NVIDIA and AMD? Well, after I reviewed them in 2022, the Arc A750 and A770 turned out higher than I assumed, although they had been additionally held again by Intel’s poor drivers. But it appears Intel has discovered from its errors.

The new $250 Arc B580 performs higher than AMD’s low-end Radeon 7600, and it could actually even tangle a bit with NVIDIA in terms of price range ray tracing. The solely query is that if it is value investing in an Intel video card given its rocky company outlook. But for such an inexpensive video card, with a worth that harkens again to the early 2000s, the chance could also be value it.

Intel

Intel’s Arc B580 is a rarity: A $250 GPU that delivers stable 1080p and 1440p gaming, even with a little bit of ray tracing.

Pros

• Faster than a Radeon 7600 and RTX 4060
• XeSS upscaling works properly
• Cool and quiet efficiency
• Just $250

Cons

• XeSS isn’t as extensively supported as DLSS 3
• New AMD playing cards could outclass it

$250 at Newegg

The B580 marks the debut of Intel’s second-generation Arc Xe2 GPUs, and it will be joined by the $219 B570 subsequent month. Based on their specs alone, it is easy to see why they’re compelling for price range video games. The B580 options 20 Xe cores, 20 ray tracing items and a quicker clock pace than the earlier Arc playing cards. Most importantly, although, it is rocking 12GB of VRAM with a 192-bit reminiscence interface, giving it greater than sufficient room to pump out 1440p gameplay.

The $299 NVIDIA RTX 4060, compared, is caught with 8GB of VRAM and a much more restricted 128-bit interface. Even the RTX 4060 Ti sports activities that meager quantity of VRAM, limiting each of these GPUs principally to 1080p gameplay (particularly in case you needed a little bit of ray tracing). AMD’s Radeon RX 7600, which fits for round $269, can be burdened with 8GB of RAM and weaker ray tracing efficiency than NVIDIA and Intel’s playing cards.

While Intel has a transparent {hardware} benefit, timing is as soon as once more a significant concern. The Arc B580 launched as we’re getting ready for CES 2025, the place each NVIDIA and AMD are anticipated to point out off new desktop GPUs. Given NVIDIA’s ever-increasing costs, I would not wager on seeing an RTX 5060 round $250, however AMD is one other story. It’s been making an attempt to make an impression within the low- and mid-range GPU marketplace for years, and that’s reportedly nonetheless the case with its RDNA 4 playing cards. There’s probability we’ll finally see some kind of cheap next-gen GPU from AMD.

If that you must construct a price range gaming rig within the subsequent few months or so, although, the Arc B580 will serve you properly. In my testing, it scored barely increased than the RTX 4060 Ti in 3DMark’s Timespy Extreme Benchmark, and it was additionally noticeably quicker than the Radeon 7600. The B580 shone even brighter with ray tracing. I hit a 58 fps common within the Cyberpunk 2077 benchmark operating at 1080p with Ultra graphics settings and mid-range ray tracing. The Radeon 7600, alternatively, generally struggled to remain above 40 fps with comparable settings.

I used to be genuinely shocked by how properly the Arc B580 tackled 1440p gaming. In Dragon Age: The Veilguard, I hit 70 fps on common with excessive graphics settings, mid-range ray tracing and Intel’s XeSS upscaling flipped on. That’s higher efficiency than you may see on the $700 PlayStation 5 Pro (although admittedly, Sony’s PSSR AI upscaling would possibly look higher to your eyes). I additionally hit 85 fps on common whereas taking part in Halo Infinite in 1440p with maxed out graphics, which was barely higher than the 4060 Ti. While we’re used to price range playing cards being primarily restricted to 1080p gaming, the Arc B580’s further reminiscence clearly makes it properly suitedfor 1440p.

Still, there are advantages that the competitors affords. NVIDIA’s RTX GPUs may work with its specialised apps, like NVIDIA Broadcaster, which might clear up your audio and video for streams and recordings. Additionally, NVIDIA’s DLSS 3 upscaling is obtainable on over 500 video games, whereas Intel’s XeSS simply cracked 200. And then there’s the motive force subject: NVIDIA has many years of expertise crafting stable GPU software program, whereas Intel remains to be recovering from its latest driver missteps. At least the XeSS 2 AI upscaling appears extra helpful than AMD’s FSR 3 (FidelityFX Super Resolution), as Intel’s tech seems to be dramatically higher and might usually improve a recreation’s efficiency by 30 % or extra.

The Arc B580 additionally survived a number of hours of benchmarking and gaming with none {hardware} or driver points. When I first examined the Arc A750 and A770, they’d usually crash inside an hour of testing. Intel’s software program has clearly made some progress. The B580 reference mannequin I examined additionally stayed comparatively cool underneath load, and it by no means surpassed 64 levels celsius (which additionally stored its two massive followers from ever making a lot noise). While there can be third-party playing cards out there, I used to be additionally impressed by Intel’s reference design: The B580 feels premium and durable, not low cost and plasticky like many different price range GPUs.

At this level, it looks as if Intel is already having bother conserving the Arc B580 in inventory, a uncommon good drawback for the beleaguered chip big. It’s straightforward to see why players are smitten: It delivers stable 1080p and 1440p efficiency for many new titles, even with a little bit of ray tracing. Finally, there’s a viable $250 GPU that doesn’t make you’re feeling such as you’re desperately behind the pack. It’s a transparent win for Intel – at the very least till we see what’s new from AMD.