Jay-Z’s rape accuser is staying nameless.
A New York choose has dominated that the girl accusing Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs of rape can proceed along with her lawsuit and stay nameless.
According to court docket paperwork obtained by The Post Thursday, Judge Analisa Torres determined that “the burden of the components ideas in favoring of permitting plaintiff to stay nameless, a minimum of for this stage of the litigation.”
Torres defined her reasoning, stating that the court docket “shouldn’t be required to checklist every of the components or use any explicit formulation so long as it’s clear that the court docket balanced the pursuits at stake in reaching its conclusion.”
The choose decided that the alleged sufferer is “significantly weak to the doable harms of disclosure” as a result of she allegedly “continues to expertise despair, post-traumatic stress dysfunction and a seizure dysfunction related to the stress of her sexual assault.”
Torres additionally criticized Jay-Z — born Shawn Carter — and his legal professional, Alex Spiro, for opposing the Alabama girl’s request to stay nameless, referring to her as “Jane Doe.”
She wrote in her ruling, “Carter’s lawyer’s relentless submitting of combative motions containing inflammatory language and advert hominem assaults is inappropriate, a waste of judicial assets and a tactic unlikely to learn his consumer.”
“The court docket won’t fast-track the judicial course of merely as a result of counsel calls for it.”
Earlier this month, the plaintiff amended her October criticism in opposition to Combs to additionally title Jay-Z, each 55, as the opposite male celeb who allegedly raped her at a 2000 MTV Video Music Awards afterparty when she was 13.
