Home Business Financial Crime Weekly: Cantor Fitzgerald Charged With Violating AntiFraud Provisions, Ex-ComTech CEO...

Financial Crime Weekly: Cantor Fitzgerald Charged With Violating AntiFraud Provisions, Ex-ComTech CEO Charged With Insider Trading – Satellogic (NASDAQ:SATL)

0


SEC Charges Cantor Fitzgerald With Causing 2 SPACs To Make Misleading Statements

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday charged  monetary companies agency Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. with inflicting two particular goal acquisition corporations that it managed to make deceptive statements to traders forward of their preliminary public choices. 

The SEC’s Order states {that a} group of Cantor Fitzgerald executives managed two SPACs in 2020 and 2021 which raised $750 million from traders by IPOs. The SEC’s order finds that Cantor Fitzgerald induced the SPACs of their SEC filings to disclaim having had contact or substantive discussions with potential enterprise mixture targets previous to their IPOs. 

However, the Order finds that on the time of every SPAC’s IPO, Cantor Fitzgerald personnel had already begun negotiations with a bunch of potential goal corporations for the SPACs, together with with View, Inc. VIEWQ and Satellogic, Inc. SATL, the businesses with which the SPACs ultimately merged.

“Cantor Fitzgerald misled traders a couple of essential funding consideration by repeatedly stating in public filings that it had not recognized or approached any potential merger targets, regardless of having had substantive discussions with a number of non-public corporations relating to a possible merger, together with with the businesses with which its SPACs ultimately merged,” mentioned Sanjay Wadhwa, Acting Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

The order costs Cantor with inflicting violations of sure antifraud and proxy provisions of the federal securities legal guidelines. Cantor Fitzgerald agreed to stop and desist from violations of the charged provisions and to pay a $6.75 million civil penalty with out admitting or denying the order’s findings. 

SEC Charges Former Comtech CEO with Insider Trading

The SEC introduced insider buying and selling costs on Wednesday in opposition to Ken Peterman, the previous CEO of Comtech Telecommunications Corp. CMTL, in connection together with his sale of Comtech shares forward of Comtech’s forthcoming detrimental quarterly earnings outcomes.

According to the SEC grievance, Peterman acquired a confidential presentation detailing Comtech’s forthcoming detrimental quarterly earnings outcomes on March 4, 2024 and knowledgeable that he was being terminated for trigger eight days later. 

The SEC’s grievance alleges that just some hours after he was terminated, and whereas below two totally different buying and selling blackouts, Peterman positioned an order to promote Comtech inventory.

On March 18, 2024, Comtech reported its detrimental quarterly earnings, which induced its inventory worth to drop greater than 25 %. The grievance alleges that Peterman averted losses by promoting the shares upfront of Comtech’s detrimental earnings announcement. 

Peterman additionally allegedly directed his monetary advisor to promote extra Comtech inventory he held in a joint account, however the monetary advisor was unable to finish the sale. Peterman allegedly would have averted extra losses of about $110,000 had the commerce been executed. 

“There is not any grey space with regards to buying and selling on the idea of fabric private info in breach of 1’s fiduciary obligation. C-suite executives just like the defendant, a CEO with a long time of expertise, know that it’s unlawful to make use of their firm’s confidential info for their very own monetary acquire,” mentioned Tejal D. Shah, Associate Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office. 

“Our motion right now ought to function a robust deterrent to these executives who may take into consideration happening the identical path,” Shah added. 

The grievance costs Peterman with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and seeks everlasting injunctive aid, disgorgement with prejudgment curiosity, civil penalties and a bar stopping Peterman from serving as an officer or director of a public firm.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York additionally introduced prison costs in opposition to Peterman on Wednesday. 

Read Next: 

Image: Shutterstock

Market News and Data dropped at you by Benzinga APIs

Exit mobile version