Journalists who helped the White House cowl up President Biden’s psychological decline must be held liable for deceptive the general public, The New York Post demanded in a scathing new editorial.
“Dem-friendly journalists noticed the identical proof as the remainder of us that Biden was compromised, and as a substitute of being skeptical, asking questions and placing the White House’s ft to the fireplace — doing their jobs — they joined the campaign to gaslight America,” the Post’s editorial board wrote Wednesday.
As Biden prepares to go away workplace, the media is dealing with renewed scrutiny over the way it lined one of many greatest tales of the yr — issues that Biden was unfit for office.
Throughout the 2024 presidential race, many media pundits and commentators ran to Biden’s protection when there was hypothesis about his psychological acuity, together with after Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report about him being well-meaning but forgetful, viral movies of him wanting confused and a Wall Street Journal report about his faltering behind-the-scenes demeanor.
Despite polls displaying the vast majority of Americans felt Biden was too previous to serve a second time period, many journalists handled questions on Biden’s well being like a right-wing conspiracy.
“The complete concept that Biden was something however wholesome — virile, even — was handled as a right-wing, tin-foil-hat speaking level,” the Post wrote.
These issues got here to a tipping level after Biden’s faltering June debate efficiency, after which he was pressured to drop out of the race.
“And at each flip, spineless, in-the-tank journos obediently did Team Biden’s propagandistic soiled work — proper up till the talk, when Biden’s senility grew to become too unmistakable to proceed denying,” the Post’s editorial continued.
“Now they’re performing bashful, but it surely’s far too late to salvage their shredded credibility,” the Post wrote, referring to a current Semafor report the place a number of liberal journalists admitted that their protection of Biden was their worst take of 2024.
CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST MEDIA AND CULTURE NEWS
“I come out of 2024 with quite a lot of contempt for the president and for the folks round him — who’ve basically been engaged in elder abuse — and likewise with a good quantity of embarrassment that I didn’t see by way of their deception earlier,” journalist Josh Barro advised Semafor.
“Like many others, I used to be utterly, completely, completely, embarrassingly fallacious, about Biden’s lack of psychological competence,” former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan additionally confessed to the outlet.
The revelations come at a time when belief within the media is at a historic low, in line with Gallup polling.
FLASHBACK: MEDIA, TOP DEMOCRATS AND LEADERS RAN PASSIONATE DEFENSE OF BIDEN’S ABILITY TO SERVE
Biden’s former defenders within the media should not be let off the hook, the Post’s editorial board insisted.
“No one who perpetuated, hid or ignored this grotesque scandal ought to ever dwell it down,” the editorial continued.
The criticism follows a recent Wall Street Journal report, citing interviews with present and former White House workers, which alleged that Biden’s stamina points had been obvious inside his first few months in workplace.
The White House pushed back on the substance of the Journal’s report in a press release supplied to Fox News Digital, saying Biden’s coverage accomplishments present “indeniable proof” of his {qualifications} and management.
Fox News’ Joshua Q. Nelson and Hanna Panreck contributed to this report.