Justin Baldoni by no means wished to “damage” Blake Lively.
The actor, by means of his legal professional Bryan Freedman, has strongly denied accusations that he orchestrated a smear marketing campaign towards his former co-star Blake Lively following the discharge of It Ends With Us.
During an look on the Today Show Friday, Freedman refuted the claims, stating unequivocally, “One hundred p.c no.”
He elaborated that Baldoni, 40, harbored no sick will towards Lively, 37, including, “Justin Baldoni, from the get-go, stated, ‘I don’t need to do something unfavourable towards her. I don’t need to damage her.’”
Despite the denial, Freedman confirmed that Baldoni “completely” plans to countersue Lively in response to her lawsuit.
He additionally revealed plans to launch all textual content exchanges between the previous co-stars to supply what he claims is the complete context lacking from the allegations.
Freedman addressed the textual content messages shared by The New York Times in Lively’s lawsuit, stating they had been “introduced with out context.”
He emphasised transparency, saying, “I’m greater than keen to take each single textual content message that exists on the market, lay them out, put them on a web site for the world to see, have them see the reality and decide the reality for themselves.”
Last month, Lively filed a lawsuit accusing Baldoni of body-shaming her, making an attempt so as to add extra specific scenes to the film, displaying her inappropriate photos and movies, breaking character throughout filming to proceed kissing her, and launching what she described as a “social manipulation” marketing campaign to break her fame.
When questioned in regards to the allegations of inappropriate habits on the set of It Ends With Us, Freedman acknowledged that discomfort can happen in skilled settings however questioned whether or not the habits amounted to sexual harassment.
“I feel there’s some habits all the time that may make folks uncomfortable, and I don’t assume anyone has the intention to try this,” he stated. “The query, actually, on this case is does it rise to the extent of sexual harassment?”
