Home Top Stories Supreme Court rejects Trump hush cash sentencing delay bid

Supreme Court rejects Trump hush cash sentencing delay bid

0

Former U.S. President Donald Trump, alongside his legal professional Todd Blanche, speaks to the media as he arrives for his felony trial for allegedly protecting up hush cash funds at Manhattan Criminal Court on May 30, 2024 in New York City.

Michael M. Santiago | Via Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday denied a request by President-elect Donald Trump to halt proceedings in his New York felony hush cash case, clearing the way in which for him to be sentenced on Friday morning.

The 5-4 decision got here hours after New York state’s highest appeals court docket refused to delay Trump’s sentencing.

Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh would have granted Trump’s request for an emergency keep, the court docket mentioned in a short order.

The majority decided that Trump’s sentencing would impose a “comparatively insubstantial” burden on his presidential obligations, since he’s anticipated to obtain a sentence that entails no precise punishment, the order mentioned.

Those 5 justices — with Chief Justice John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett becoming a member of liberals Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson — had been additionally unswayed by Trump’s arguments about using sure proof throughout his felony trial.

Those alleged evidentiary violations “will be addressed within the odd course on attraction,” the bulk dominated, in line with the order.

Trump was convicted final May in state court docket in Manhattan of 34 counts of falsifying enterprise information associated to a $130,000 hush cash cost to porn star Stormy Daniels earlier than the 2016 presidential election.

Trump’s attorneys in Wednesday’s Supreme Court submitting argued that each one additional proceedings ought to be placed on maintain whereas the president-elect appeals the responsible verdicts in New York.

The case ought to be stayed to “forestall grave injustice and hurt to the establishment of the Presidency and the operations of the federal authorities,” they wrote within the 51-page submitting.

They argued that Trump, as president-elect, is immune from felony prosecution. New York trial court docket Judge Juan Merchan had rejected that declare.

They additionally argued that the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office violated Trump’s immunity privileges through the use of proof of his official presidential acts through the hush cash trial.

The Supreme Court final July tremendously expanded the scope of presidential immunity when it dominated that former presidents take pleasure in “presumptive immunity” for all their official acts in workplace.

Prosecutors for Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg responded earlier Thursday that “there is no such thing as a foundation” for the Supreme Court to intervene within the case.

The group of legal professionals for the president-elect consists of a number of who’ve been picked for high roles within the subsequent administration’s Department of Justice.

A New York appeals court and the state’s highest court had each denied Trump’s bid to pause his Friday morning sentencing listening to.

Read extra CNBC politics protection

Merchan had already postponed Trump’s sentencing quite a few instances, each earlier than and after the Nov. 5 presidential election.

The choose is predicted impose a sentence of “unconditional discharge,” which implies Trump is not going to obtain jail time, probation, fines or another circumstances.

On Wednesday afternoon, ABC News first reported that Trump spoke with conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito in the future earlier than the president-elect requested the court docket for the rapid keep.

Alito confirmed that the Tuesday afternoon telephone name occurred, however mentioned in an announcement that the hush-money case didn’t come up.

“We didn’t talk about the emergency utility he filed at present, and certainly, I used to be not even conscious on the time of our dialog that such an utility could be filed,” Alito mentioned.

CNBC’s Dan Mangan contributed to this report.

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exit mobile version