A U.S. courtroom dominated in August that Google has a search monopoly, and whereas Google appeals, the Justice Department is determining what sort of potential penalties to impose — like breaking off Chrome.
As a part of this course of, the DOJ needs to name on a particular witness, based on a latest courtroom submitting: Dmitry Shevelenko, chief enterprise officer of Perplexity, an AI search supplier most lately valued at $9 billion, per Reuters.
Perplexity and different generative AI instruments like OpenAI’s ChatGPT Search have emerged as a possible substitute for looking out the web, as they will supply direct solutions to sophisticated queries (albeit, typically with made-up or inaccurate data). Google has responded to the menace with its personal AI search instruments, equivalent to AI Overviews, which offer AI-generated solutions above search outcomes.
The DOJ needs to ask Shevelenko about “generative AI’s relationship with Search Access Points, distribution, limitations to entry and growth, and knowledge sharing.”
“Search entry factors” is a time period the DOJ makes use of to explain issues like Google Chrome — locations the place folks go to look the web.
While the submitting doesn’t spell out precisely why the DOJ needs to ask Perplexity about these matters, it may assist its argument that Google monopolizes the search enterprise and closes out potential opponents, and thus deserves stronger penalties.
TechCrunch requested Perplexity whether or not it has agreed to have its govt testify and for its ideas on the antitrust case. Perplexity didn’t reply instantly to a request for remark, and neither did Google.
Perplexity is successfully caught in the course of the dispute, as either side need data from it that would assist their circumstances. Google subpoenaed Perplexity in October for firm paperwork to make its personal case that it has viable competitors within the search discipline. (Google subpoenaed Microsoft and OpenAI as nicely.)
However, Perplexity has but to offer “a single doc” to Google as of December 11, the tech large lamented in a courtroom submitting, claiming that there’s “no conceivable justification for additional delay” after two months of ready.
For its half, Perplexity says within the submitting that it has already agreed to satisfy 12 out of Google’s 14 doc requests however is “nonetheless evaluating the burden related to accumulating such a probably expansive universe of paperwork.”
Perplexity additionally says that whereas it has agreed to offer copies of licensing agreements “associated to AI coaching,” Google needs all of Perplexity’s licensing agreements and that it has requested Google to “meet and confer” about this.
