Red dye 3 is a petroleum based mostly coloration additive that is been used for many years, to present meals and drinks vibrant, flashy coloring.
mtreasure/Getty pictures
cover caption
toggle caption
mtreasure/Getty pictures
The Food and Drug Administration is contemplating a ban on meals dye, Red No. 3. The company has been reviewing a petition to ban the colorant since 2022. The petroleum-based dye has been used for greater than 50 years in 1000’s of merchandise together with sweet, snack meals, and soda. An FDA spokesperson tells NPR a call may come “quickly.”
Questions concerning the dye’s potential well being results return a long time. The FDA banned using the Red No. 3 in cosmetics and medicated ointments and lotions again in 1990. Research confirmed the dye may trigger most cancers in animals in excessive doses. But the company concluded it was secure within the quantities utilized in meals.
The company says it has evaluated the protection of Red No. 3 “a number of instances” since its authentic approval to be used in meals in 1969.
But the priority about use of the dye in meals has grown. Last yr, the state of California handed a regulation to ban Red No. 3 — the regulation is slated to take impact in 2027. Lawmakers in ten different states have launched laws to ban Red No. 3 in meals, in keeping with the Center for Science in The Public Interest.
State actions like these put strain on the FDA to decide on this challenge. “Over the previous few years, there have been an growing variety of state payments to ban sure components and set limits for sure contaminants,” a spokesperson for the FDA advised NPR through e-mail. “However, a powerful nationwide meals security system just isn’t constructed state by state.”
As NPR reported final yr, California’s Environmental Protection Agency reviewed the analysis on artificial dyes, and located proof that when consumed in meals they’ll negatively have an effect on youngsters’s habits. Out of about 25 research, greater than half pointed to an affiliation with habits.
“I believe the proof is compelling from these human research that youngsters’s consumption of artificial meals dyes can contribute to will increase in signs like inattention, hyperactivity in some youngsters,” Mark Miller, a scientist with California’s EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment advised NPR in 2023.
The FDA has mentioned it would proceed to look at the consequences of coloration components on youngsters’s habits.
“The totality of scientific proof exhibits that the majority youngsters haven’t any antagonistic results when consuming meals containing coloration components, however some proof means that sure youngsters could also be delicate to them,” wrote the authors of an FDA shopper replace titled “How Safe Are Color Additives?” which was up to date in 2023.
But the Center for Science within the Public Interest, which introduced the Red No. 3 petition, says there is no motive so as to add artificial dyes to meals.
“Red 3, like each meals dye, solely serves as a advertising instrument for the meals trade,” says Thomas Galligan, principal scientist for meals components and dietary supplements at CSPI. “It’s simply there to make meals look visually interesting so that customers wish to spend their cash on it.”
He factors out that Red No. 3 is banned or severely restricted in lots of international locations, together with Australia, Japan and European Union international locations.
His group has been urging the FDA to ban eight artificial meals dyes since 2008, together with a gaggle of purple, blue, yellow and inexperienced dyes and a not often used orange hue.
Red No. 3 has been singled out for a ban as a result of proof on most cancers in animals. “It’s very low-hanging fruit that the FDA actually ought to have picked a long time in the past,” Galligan advised NPR in 2023.
Earlier this yr, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a second regulation to ban a gaggle of six different artificial dyes in class meals.
The National Confectioners Association pointed NPR to the trade’s newest assertion on meals components. It says the trade is dedicated to meals security, and that its merchandise are made “utilizing solely FDA-approved components.”
The meals trade has proven that it could actually pivot to options. For occasion, when Kraft meals determined to take artificial meals dyes out of its mac and cheese merchandise, it changed them with colours from spices comparable to paprika and turmeric.
Edited by Jane Greenhalgh and Carmel Wroth
