President-elect Donald J. Trump will encounter an Iran that’s instantly much more brittle than it was throughout his first administration, its management extra unsure, its nuclear program extra uncovered and weak to assault.
That new actuality has touched off an inside debate about how his administration ought to strategy Tehran: with an openness to negotiations, or with an assault on its nuclear enrichment program — overt or covert, or maybe initiated by Israel.
Or, as many recommend, a spherical of “coercive diplomacy” that leaves Tehran to decide on both a negotiated disassembly of its nuclear functionality, or a compelled one.
The urgency of the problem was underscored on Sunday by Jake Sullivan, President Biden’s nationwide safety adviser, who informed Fareed Zakaria of CNN that with Iran’s principal proxies weakened or eradicated, “it’s no surprise there are voices saying ‘Hey, perhaps we have to go for a nuclear weapon proper now.’”
He added that he had mentioned the “actual threat” of an Iranian race for the bomb with the Trump nationwide safety staff and with the Israelis.
In interviews over the previous two weeks, American and international officers have mentioned that the menacing dance over Iran’s nuclear future may take a dramatic flip within the subsequent few months. That evaluation got here after the U.N.’s high nuclear inspector warned that Iran was accelerating its enrichment of near-bomb-grade uranium.
We are having bother retrieving the article content material.
Please allow JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you on your endurance whereas we confirm entry. If you’re in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you on your endurance whereas we confirm entry.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
